Comparing "equaliser" vs "equalizer"

I want to provide both versions while keeping it concise. I’ll focus on polished headline and quote styles.

For English variants, I’ll present:

1. Neutral: "Bayer: We scored in the 90th minute only to be pegged back in the 90th. That's brutal."
2. Reporter style: "Bayer: To score in the 90th and concede the equaliser in stoppage time — that's gutting."

But since the original mentions both at the 90th minute, I wonder if I should translate or rephrase for context. Let's finalize this!